What Went Well?
- The typography is great. All names and other information are copied perfectly.
- The opening logo matches the one used from the original title sequence.
- The credits flowed in and out nicely.
What Didn't Go So Well?
- The credits are slightly too fast - the should be a little bit slower.
- The font isn't correct - This is because the font used in the actual title sequence is unavailable unless you pay for it.
- The transition isn't completely correct. The credits on the original title sequence don't fade in like our do.
- The colour of the text is slightly too light.
What Have I Learnt?
- From this task, I have learnt that the title sequence is easy to make. However, this is not because my group chose a simple title sequence to replicate. The reason my group choose not to re-create a opening sequence with footage was because my group mainly wanted to focus on the credits and their transitions, despite this making our group come across as being less creative (this is so not true). I believe the footage the titles are placed on isn't that important. This is because there are plenty of title opening sequences with footage and they have the same effect as title sequences with footage (in the end they all have the same purpose, to inform the audience of who was involved). Despite all this, I have learnt that transitions, timing. font and colour are all important. If the titles are too fast they are hard to read, if they are too slow the audience loses interest, if the titles have transitions are over the top (spinning around and pulsing) it gets very annoying. However, if the tittles have no transition they can be slightly boring. Lastly, colour and font are very important. The font needs to match the genre and be easy to read. The colour also has to be sensible and stand out from the background footage or background colour so the audience can actually read the credits.
No comments:
Post a Comment